Loom Alternatives 2026: Cap, Claap, Tella, Zight, Vidyard, ScreenPal and Microsoft Clipchamp

Cap is the first Loom alternative to shortlist for routine team updates and control over where recordings live; Claap fits teams that want meeting recordings and async video in one workspace. These 7 Loom alternatives solve different jobs: Tella for polished demos, Zight for visual support, Vidyard for sales, ScreenPal for training, and Microsoft Clipchamp for organizations already working in Microsoft 365.

The choice starts with what happens after you press Stop. A colleague needs a decision. A prospect needs a reason to reply. A customer needs instructions they can follow. Buying the same recorder for all those jobs can leave you paying for features nobody uses while missing the feature that matters.

Pricing and documented capabilities verified on 3 November 2026. This is a comparison of makers' live plans and documentation, not a hands-on speed or transcription-accuracy test. The recommendations below distinguish included AI from upgrades, and a free plan from a trial.

Best Loom Alternatives at a Glance

Start with Cap for everyday async updates, then move to the specialist that solves your missing job. Async means the recipient watches and responds later, without everyone joining a call. The order favors that everyday team use case; Vidyard can be the right sales purchase even though it is lower in the general shortlist.

Prices are USD. Annual rates below require annual billing. The starting-price column names the paid entry relevant to the comparison; where a sales team needs a custom-priced tier, that distinction is explicit.

These rates come directly from Cap, Claap, Tella, Zight, Vidyard, ScreenPal and Microsoft. ScreenPal labels its displayed team price as an offer. Recheck the billing period, seat minimum and checkout terms before committing.

The Seven Picks, by the Work You Need Done

1. Cap: Best for Async Team Updates and Storage Control

Cap is an open-source screen recorder for teams that want a quick shared update and a choice about where the recording lives. Its strongest advantage over Loom is that storage and deployment are decisions you can make: Cap documents its hosted service, your own storage and self-hosted Cap Web. For a founder sending product decisions to colleagues, that is a more useful reason to switch than another collection of recording effects. Cap's product overview describes both immediate sharing and local editing.

Best for: Founders and team leads sharing routine updates, especially when storage control matters.
Standout: A choice between hosted sharing, connected storage and running Cap Web yourself.
Pricing: Cap Pro starts at $8.16 per user/month, billed annually, including commercial desktop rights and cloud collaboration. Cap pricing.
Free trial: A personal-use free option is documented; the pricing page does not specify a fixed Pro trial duration.

Imagine a product lead explaining why a customer-facing screen needs to change. The useful output is a shareable recording with a readable summary and a place for feedback. Cap Pro includes team workspaces, password-protected shares, viewer analytics and a Loom importer. Its homepage also documents timestamped comments, so feedback can point to the confusing moment instead of saying “somewhere near the end.” That makes Cap a sensible first pilot for ordinary internal updates.

The AI detail: Pro documents generated titles, summaries, clickable chapters and transcripts. The transcript can also serve as captions, and the share page lets you correct the transcript and summary. Cap's self-hosting documentation additionally describes transcript translation through configured AI providers. That documentation is not a promise that the free desktop application includes a hosted translation service. Cap AI and sharing, self-hosted AI configuration.

The commercial-use distinction matters more than the word “open source.” Cap's distributed desktop application requires a commercial license for internal company communication as well as promotional content. Pro includes that license. Cap explicitly exempts versions you build yourself from source from this particular binary-license requirement, but maintaining your own build is a separate operational choice. Do not equip a company with the personal free download on the assumption that open source means unrestricted use of the distributed app. Commercial licensing.

For self-hosting, nominate someone to own updates, backups and access settings before choosing it. An agency with no infrastructure owner will usually get more value from hosted Pro than from making its founder responsible for a video server.

A useful Cap pilot is a complete handoff, not just a successful recording. Use this sequence before moving the library:

1. 1

   Choose the capture mode

   Use Instant Mode for an update that should become a shared link. Use Studio Mode when you need local recording and an editing pass. These are the two workflows Cap documents on its product page.

2. 2

   Record a decision someone can act on

   Show the relevant screen, explain the problem and finish with the decision you need. Use a harmless example while checking your workspace and sharing settings.

3. 3

   Review the text and access

   On Pro, check the generated summary, transcript and chapter names. Correct product terms and confirm that the intended colleague can open the share, while an unintended viewer cannot.

4. 4

   Close the loop

   Ask the colleague to leave feedback on the relevant moment. Keep Cap if the recording, review and response work with less friction than your current process; test an imported Loom before attempting a larger migration.

2. Claap: Best for Meeting Recordings and Async Video Together

Claap is a meeting-recording and screen-video workspace for teams whose decisions arrive through both calls and recorded updates. Its advantage over Loom is the combination of configurable meeting summaries, shared channels and a path into revenue-team workflows. It earns this position when a founder wants a customer call and the follow-up walkthrough to remain part of the same working record. It is not the budget pick for sending occasional clips. Claap's plans document the recording and collaboration features together.

Best for: Teams handling customer calls, internal updates and follow-up decisions in one workspace.
Standout: Meeting capture and async screen video with custom summary templates and shared collaboration.
Pricing: Pro starts at $32 per license/month, billed annually; the USD figure is distinct from the euro prices also shown. Claap pricing.
Free trial: Sales can open a Pro or Business trial; Basic is a limited free license.

A customer-success lead might record an implementation call, then add a screen walkthrough of the proposed setup. The value is continuity: colleagues can review the conversation and the explanation without asking the lead to repeat both. Pro documents private channels, transcript search and editing, comments in the transcript, and custom AI summary templates. A consistent template can ask for the customer's goal, the unresolved question and the next action, making recordings easier to review across an account.

The AI detail: Pro includes multilingual transcripts, AI subtitles, automatic chapters and advanced summaries. Transcript translation is on Business, alongside CRM auto-enrichment and coaching. A transcript of a Spanish-language conversation and an English translation of that transcript are different outputs; do not buy Pro expecting the second because the first is included. Claap's feature comparison.

The important limit is 1,000 transcription and recording minutes per month on Pro, despite its unlimited recording count. It also lists 500 monthly AI credits per license, pooled across the workspace, and a two-year recording-storage duration. A lead recording twenty hour-long meetings would have 1,200 minutes before adding any async updates. That illustrative workload already exceeds the published Pro allowance. Ask for the appropriate entitlement before rolling it out to people who record calls all day.

Claap allows paid and free Basic licenses in the same workspace. That can suit an organization where a few people create most recordings and others review them. Give active recorders the plan they need, then check collaborator permissions and limits rather than automatically paying for identical licenses for everyone.

Choose Claap when consolidating recordings changes how decisions get followed up. Loom now offers meeting recording too, so “it records meetings” alone is not a sufficient reason to migrate.

3. Tella: Best for Product Demos That Need an Editing Pass

Tella is a screen-video recorder and editor for founders who want a product demonstration to look deliberately made. Its advantage over Loom is its emphasis on presentation: layouts, automatic zoom and transcript-based editing are part of the production workflow. Choose it when the same explanation will be watched by prospects or customers repeatedly, making an editing pass worthwhile. Tella's feature list documents the recording and editing tools.

Best for: Product demos, launch walkthroughs and customer-facing tutorials.
Standout: Editing the presentation of a screen recording, including layouts and zooms.

Tella Pricing: Start With Pro for Collaborative Demo Production

Pricing: Pro starts at $13 per user/month, billed annually, with team collaboration and 4K export. Tella pricing.
Free trial: Seven days; the trial includes Tella Agent credits, while Auto Capture requires a paid plan.

For a SaaS founder demonstrating a new onboarding flow, the job is to direct attention to the part of the screen the viewer should notice. Record the explanation in manageable clips, remove a false start, then use framing and zoom to make the important interaction legible. The editing tools support that approach; whether the result is clearer still needs a viewer's judgment. An internal status update that expires tomorrow usually does not deserve the same production effort.

The AI detail: Tella lists transcription in 106 languages, AI-generated titles and descriptions, automatic chapters, mistake finding, and silence and filler-word removal. Tella Agent can make edits from a chat. Pro supplies 4,500 credits per user each month, pooled across the workspace, for the Agent and Auto Capture. Included credits reset monthly; unlimited videos do not mean unlimited agent work. Current Tella plans.

Paid plans also document translated subtitles in up to ten languages per video. Viewers can select a language, or you can export with a translation burned into the video. This translates subtitles, not the spoken voice. Correct the original transcript first, because an incorrect product name can spread into every translated track. Tella's translation guide.

The buying boundary is branding. Premium adds a custom domain, removal of Tella branding and domain restrictions for embedded videos. Pro is the starting choice when creating clear demonstrations is the goal; request the higher tier when those publishing controls are requirements. Do not confuse an embed-domain restriction with a blanket promise that every shared video is private.

Pick Tella when the finished video is a reusable asset. If the main output is an account's meeting record, Claap is the more relevant pilot.

4. Zight: Best for Visual Support and Getting a Recording Back

Zight is a visual communication tool combining screen recordings, screenshots, GIFs and requests for other people to record their screen. Its most useful advantage over Loom for a support lead is that two-way workflow: send an explanation, then collect evidence of what the customer sees. Zight says Video Request recipients need neither an account nor an installation. Zight's pricing page describes the request workflow and allowances.

Best for: Customer support, internal IT and teams explaining problems visually.
Standout: Requesting a recording from a customer and keeping the response with your visual communication tools.
Pricing: Collaborate starts at $12 per user/month, billed annually, and is positioned for teams of two or more. Zight pricing.
Free trial: Ask sales about a team trial; Share is the free plan.

Consider a support lead receiving “the checkout button does nothing.” Another written question may still fail to reveal the customer's sequence of actions. A recording request can show that sequence, while a response recording can demonstrate the correction. Collaborate lists 50 Video Requests and includes team administration, custom branding, viewer analytics and private-sharing controls. Check how the request allowance will apply to your support workload before adopting it across the queue.

The AI detail: Zight documents automatic titles, transcripts, captions, summaries and Smart Chapters. Its Smart Actions can turn recordings into step-by-step guides with screenshots, alongside other structured write-ups. The AI page documents transcription and translation across more than 50 languages. That makes Zight particularly relevant when the useful end product is both a video and written instructions. Zight AI.

A support operator should still check the generated guide against the recording. The critical question is whether it preserves the action that fixed the problem, not whether it produces a tidy-looking list. If a customer mentions an exception verbally while clicking through the normal flow, keep that exception in the final instructions.

The main meeting-recording caveat is visible on the plan table: the meeting recorder is beta on Collaborate and Scale. Treat it as something to evaluate before canceling an established meeting tool. Also separate the team plan from enterprise controls: SSO, custom data retention and custom S3 storage sit on Scale, while premium support integrations are add-ons below Scale. Zight plan boundaries.

Choose Zight when resolving a problem requires seeing both sides of the screen-sharing exchange. For a team that mostly publishes polished product demonstrations, Tella's editing focus is the better starting point.

5. Vidyard: Best for Sales Video Connected to Buyer Activity

Vidyard is a video platform for revenue teams that need to know how prospects respond to video messages. Its advantage over Loom is the sales workflow around the recording: branded sharing pages, calls to action, team analytics and CRM connections. A CRM is the system where your sales team keeps account and deal records. Buy Vidyard when video activity should inform the next sales action, not just prove that somebody opened a link. Vidyard's plans show that progression.

Best for: Sales teams using personalized video in prospecting and deal follow-up.
Standout: Connecting video engagement and calls to action to a revenue workflow.
Pricing: Starter displays $59 USD per seat/month, billed annually; a CRM-connected sales team should evaluate Teams, with custom pricing. Vidyard pricing.
Free trial: A 14-day Starter trial is listed; a free account is also available.

A sales manager's pilot should follow the whole chain: create a relevant prospect message, share it on the intended page, inspect engagement and decide how the representative should follow up. Vidyard Starter includes full video analytics, team performance analytics, branded sharing pages and CTA templates. Those features can help a rep turn a demonstration into a specific next step, such as booking a conversation.

The upgrade boundary is consequential. Teams adds CRM and marketing-automation integrations, more advanced team analytics and fully customizable calls to action. The advertised Starter price is therefore not a reliable budget for a team whose requirement is syncing buyer activity into its sales system. Ask for a Teams quote against the integrations and users you need, rather than treating every salesperson as a generic recording seat.

The AI detail: Vidyard documents script generation, stock and custom avatars, and Video Agent, which creates and delivers personalized videos. Unlimited Video Agent functionality is an add-on. The current pricing page lists captions with Teams, and caption translations on Teams and Enterprise as an add-on billed by translated minute. It does not establish an included meeting-summary or automatic-chapter entitlement for this comparison. Vidyard's AI and caption terms.

That is a different AI proposition from Claap's meeting notes or Cap's recording summaries. A sales leader may value generated outreach; a founder trying to understand yesterday's implementation call probably wants a faithful record and reviewed action items instead.

Choose Vidyard when sales follow-up is the deliverable. It is a poor default purchase for an organization mainly replacing internal status meetings.

6. ScreenPal: Best for Tutorials and Training on a Team Plan

ScreenPal is a screen-recording, editing and hosting tool with training features such as quizzes. Its advantage over Loom for an operations lead is the ability to turn an explanation into a lesson with an understanding check. That matters when the recording explains a process employees must perform correctly, rather than a message they only need to acknowledge. ScreenPal's plans combine the creation and training features.

Best for: Onboarding, internal process tutorials and customer education.
Standout: Video lessons with quizzes and a reusable hosted training library.
Pricing: Team Business currently displays $8 per user/month, paid annually, for three or more users; the page marks this as a discounted offer. ScreenPal pricing.
Free trial: The free plan is documented; the reviewed pricing page does not state a paid-trial duration.

An operations manager teaching a returns process needs more than a view count. A short tutorial can show the task, while a quiz can check whether the employee understands which exception needs escalation. Team Business includes the Max feature set, collaboration, team management, ownership transfer and SSO. That makes it a credible option when the training content should belong to the organization after its original author moves on.

The AI detail: ScreenPal documents generated titles, summaries, transcripts, captions and chapters, plus translation and generated quiz questions. Its AI guide says titles, summaries, captions and chapters can be translated across more than 150 languages. The team administrator must enable the AI features. ScreenPal's AI documentation.

The limit that changes the recommendation is 30 minutes: the maker's AI guide currently limits generated titles, summaries, transcriptions and chapters to videos up to that length. It also says those elements can be generated once for a given video and then edited. Unlimited recording does not remove this AI limit. A training lead with long recorded workshops should plan shorter modules or verify a different processing workflow before assuming the full library will receive AI treatment.

Short modules can be useful independently of that limit. A learner trying to find the refund exception should not have to navigate an entire onboarding session. But splitting a recording is work, so include that work in the decision rather than presenting it as a hidden free benefit.

Choose ScreenPal when people need to learn and repeat a process. Do not choose it solely on the headline team price if the important recordings exceed its documented AI limit.

7. Microsoft Clipchamp: Best for Teams Already Working in Microsoft 365

Microsoft Clipchamp is Microsoft's video creation and playback environment for work accounts, alongside its separate personal-account editor. Its advantage over Loom for an existing Microsoft 365 organization is fitting video into the file-sharing and access system it already manages. Clipchamp Standard is included with eligible subscriptions, so the first move is to check the license you own. Access to the video player does not automatically prove that a user has the editor. Microsoft's product and license explanation.

Best for: Organizations keeping internal video within Microsoft 365.
Standout: Reusing work-account access and OneDrive or SharePoint sharing workflows.
Pricing: Standard is included with eligible licenses; Microsoft's page also lists standalone Clipchamp Editor Standard at $3 per user/month, paid yearly, subject to availability. Microsoft's business pricing.
Free trial: Microsoft's business page lists one-month trial terms, requiring a credit card and converting to a paid subscription unless canceled.

For an internal communications lead, the useful question is whether a recording can live where employees already find work. Microsoft's documentation describes video sharing through its existing file controls, guest access, transcript-based search and integration with Teams and SharePoint. A company announcement can therefore be part of an established internal destination rather than another video library that employees must remember to visit. Clipchamp's work features.

The AI detail: Microsoft documents automatic transcripts and captions for the spoken language, with transcript editing and search. Its work-feature list describes chapters as manually added. Do not count captions in the original language as translated subtitles, or manually authored chapters as automatic AI chapters. The reviewed Standard feature list does not establish automatic translation as an included entitlement.

Video summaries and questions are documented through Copilot in the Clipchamp player, but require a Microsoft 365 Copilot license and the Copilot for SharePoint service plan. A Standard editor license is not proof of that entitlement. The relevant cost decision is whether you already have the required licenses, not whether another page says Clipchamp “has AI.” Copilot summary requirements.

For a managed organization, use the work-account product in the pilot. Have an employee and an external recipient try the intended sharing path, because existing Microsoft policies may determine what works. A personal free account is a different deployment choice and should not silently become the home of a corporate video library.

Choose Clipchamp when your existing Microsoft environment is an advantage. If a founder needs a simple external video workflow without a managed Microsoft setup, pilot Cap or Tella first.

How to Choose Between Alternatives to Loom

The feature that changes the next action should decide the purchase. For routine updates, start with Cap. Switch that recommendation to Claap when the missing job is maintaining a shared record of calls and follow-up videos. Pick Tella when the recording must become a polished demonstration that customers will reuse.

For a support lead, the decisive question is whether you need the customer to send a recording back; that favors Zight. For a sales manager, it is whether engagement should inform account follow-up through the CRM; that favors Vidyard's appropriate team tier. For an operations manager, quizzes and structured training favor ScreenPal. For an existing Microsoft organization, already-owned licenses and established permissions make Clipchamp the first thing to check.

AI notes only help if someone reviews them and owns the next action. A summary that accurately records a disagreement is still not a decision. Make the handoff explicit: review the recording's text, correct it, then assign the follow-up in the place people already use for work.

If your actual need is a meeting notebook rather than screen-video communication, compare the meeting-focused Otter AI alternatives. Changing categories can solve the wrong problem just as easily as changing brands.

Free Loom Alternatives: What a Team Can Use

Free is only useful when the allowed use and the limits match the job. Cap's personal free offering does not license its distributed desktop application for ordinary company communication. That restriction makes it a different proposition from a free workplace plan, even though Cap is open source. Cap's licensing terms.

ScreenPal's free plan allows recordings up to 15 minutes and ten hosted videos. Zight Share limits recordings to five minutes and access to the last 50 captures. Claap Basic permits ten videos per user and 300 total minutes. These can support a narrow evaluation; none should be confused with the paid AI and team-control package described above. ScreenPal, Zight, Claap.

Clipchamp can have no additional Standard subscription cost for an eligible Microsoft 365 user. That is an existing paid entitlement, not a promise that every business account receives every Clipchamp or Copilot feature. Tella's seven-day trial is also a trial, not an ongoing free team plan.

For a paying Loom customer, a better pilot question is “Can the intended people complete the work on this plan?” A successful personal recording does not answer the team-permissions, commercial-license or AI-limit questions.

Privacy: Storage and AI Processing Are Different Decisions

Choose where the files live and where their contents are processed separately. Cap's self-hosting guide documents a video application on your infrastructure, then separate configuration for transcription and AI providers. Depending on that configuration, audio or text can still be processed by an external provider. Self-hosting the video library alone does not establish an entirely local AI workflow. Cap's deployment and AI documentation.

Microsoft similarly documents Azure Cognitive Services processing audio for Clipchamp's automatic captions. The fact that a recording belongs to a work account does not mean every processing step happens on the employee's laptop. Microsoft's caption documentation.

Translate “better privacy” into an actual requirement: named viewers, your own storage, an approved processing provider, or an organizational retention rule. Those requirements lead to different plans. For example, Zight places custom retention and custom S3 storage on Scale; Cap documents connected storage on Pro. Buy the control you need and verify its behavior with a harmless recording before uploading sensitive material.

When to Stay on Loom

Loom remains a sensible choice when your colleagues already find, watch and respond to its videos and the existing plan covers the work. Its current pricing page documents meeting recording, not just screen messages. Business + AI includes automatic meeting notes and recap emails as well as summaries, chapters and transcript-based editing. Switching only to obtain “video plus meeting notes” may solve a gap your current product no longer has. Loom's current plans.

Loom Pricing: Compare the Plan You Already Use

Loom's pricing page currently displays Business at $18 per user/month and Business + AI at $24 per user/month. It offers monthly and annual billing; verify the selected interval and purchase route against your actual account before comparing a quote. The page distinguishes Loom.com annual billing by paid users from Atlassian.com annual billing by user tiers. Loom pricing and billing terms.

Stay if the library, viewing habits and integrations are already doing the job. Jira and Confluence integrations are documented, and an existing organization may already have a useful process around them. Move when a specific alternative clears a concrete obstacle: Cap's storage choices, Tella's production workflow, Zight's recording requests or Vidyard's sales workflow.

How These Were Picked

Each recommendation must justify a different purchase, not merely offer a record button. The comparison uses makers' pricing pages and documentation checked on 3 November 2026. Each of the seven recommendations answers a distinct job for a founder or team lead.

The criteria were the work produced after recording, the paid plan needed for that work, documented AI outputs, collaboration and access controls, and the restriction most likely to surprise a buyer. The price is the maker's displayed figure, with its billing period and material minimum. The recommendations do not claim measured transcription accuracy, editing speed, security superiority or conversion uplift.

Meeting-note-only products were left outside the main shortlist because this reader also needs recorded screen communication. Purely local capture without the required sharing workflow would likewise need another tool before replacing the whole job.

The Ones to Avoid

Avoid a bad fit rather than looking for a universally bad product. Vidyard is hard to justify for internal updates when nobody will use its sales analytics or CRM workflow. Cap's personal free desktop option is the wrong license for company communication. ScreenPal is a poor assumption for automatic processing of long workshops when its documented AI limit is 30 minutes.

Do not buy Zight on the assumption that its beta meeting recorder has already replaced your established meeting workflow; evaluate the calls you depend on. Do not treat Clipchamp's personal free editor as interchangeable with a managed work-account deployment. And do not buy Claap Pro expecting Business-only translation or CRM enrichment.

Those are specific purchasing mistakes, not claims that the tools are unreliable. Each becomes a good choice when its documented strengths match the work and its limits are acceptable.

Loom Video Alternatives: A Switching Checklist

On Monday, give one owner a real workflow to move before moving the company. Pick the job that triggered the search: an internal product update, a customer support exchange, a prospect demo or a training lesson. Use the intended paid tier or its available trial, since a free account may hide the limitation you need to evaluate.

1. 1

   Name the missing result

   Write down what Loom is failing to provide in your situation. Make it observable, such as a customer returning a recording or a colleague finding the correct action in a reviewed summary.

2. 2

   Check the complete handoff

   Record, edit if needed, review the AI text, share with the intended recipient and collect the response. Check the same path from the recipient's account, not just the creator's account.

3. 3

   Check the plan against normal usage

   Confirm recording minutes, AI allowances, seat minimums, retention, integration tier and viewer access. For self-hosting, include an owner for the deployment and its processing configuration.

4. 4

   Preserve the old library before canceling

   Check exports or imports, update important documentation links and verify that historical recordings remain accessible through the transition. A new recording link does not repair an old link already embedded in a customer guide.

Keep the tool that completes that workflow with acceptable cost and ownership. If the pilot only demonstrates that the record button works, the buying question remains unanswered.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Loom the same as Zoom?

No. Zoom Meetings is a live meeting product. Loom is built around recording and sharing video, and its current plans also include meeting recording. Recording a meeting and hosting the live meeting are different jobs.

What are some alternatives to Clueso?

For the jobs covered here, consider Tella for edited screen demos, ScreenPal for tutorials with quizzes, and Cap for open-source screen capture and sharing. Choose the required output first; these recommendations do not imply identical features across every product.

What is the app called Loom?

Loom is a video communication app for recording and sharing screen and camera videos. Its workspace includes video libraries, transcripts and comments, and its current pricing page also lists meeting recording. Loom product plans.

Is Loom safe to use?

Suitability depends on the material and the controls your organization requires. Loom documents public-link, workspace and restricted sharing. For confidential recordings, select and verify the intended access rather than treating possession of a link as authentication. Loom privacy settings.

Is there anything better than Loom?

For a specific job, yes: Cap for storage choice and routine updates, Tella for demo production, Claap for a shared meeting-and-update workflow, Zight for visual support, and Vidyard for sales follow-up. Stay on Loom when its existing library and current features already meet the need.

Do people on Loom see if I saw their videos?

They may. Loom says it can identify a viewer who has a Loom account and is logged in while watching; otherwise the viewer appears anonymous. Do not assume that anonymous viewing means the video records no view activity. Loom viewer analytics.

Are my Loom videos private?

It depends on the video's setting. Public videos can be viewed by anyone with the link without a login. Open to workspace requires workspace access, while Restricted limits access to specific people. Check the setting on the actual video you intend to share. Loom privacy controls.

Why do I have a 5 minute limit on Loom?

The Starter plan limits screen recordings to five minutes and lists 25 videos per person. Its current pricing page separately lists unlimited meeting length. Business removes the screen-recording time limit. Loom's plan limits.

How much does Loom cost?

Starter is free. The current page displays Business at $18 per user/month and Business + AI at $24 per user/month; billing interval and the Loom.com versus Atlassian.com purchase route affect the quote. Check those selections before calculating a team total. Loom pricing.

Get the AI Business Workflow Audit Checklist, free with the newsletter to give each software subscription a defined job, owner and budget.